Association of corticosteroid dose and route of administration with Article

Association of corticosteroid dose and route of administration with risk of treatment failure in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - Article Example bation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or emphysema or failure of the respiratory system along with either COPD or emphysema. Two groups were formulated which included patients who were treated on low doses of corticosteroids which were administered orally as well as patients who were treated with high doses of corticosteroids which was given intravenously. After the high dose intravenous route, the number of deaths were 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3%-1.5%) and the patients who responded with primary outcomes were 10.9% (95% CI, 10.7%-11.1%) According to the multivariable regression model, the risk of the patient not responding to treatment via the oral route was less than that via the intravenous route that is (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-1.02). This model was to analyze the effect of the route chosen for the corticosteroids with the primary and secondary outcomes of the patient. High dose intravenous therapy does not provide any major benefits which are superior to the results of treatment with low dose corticosteroids administered orally. Rather the intravenous therapy is associated with pain and carries a risk of infection and higher costs in comparison to the oral low dose corticosteroid therapy. The research does provide strong support about the authors conclusion that low dose orally administered corticosteroids hold the same if not superior results for patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. This research should be sufficient to reduce the health care costs imposed by COPD because it is one of the leading problems in the United States. Low doses of corticosteroids orally would result in lower adverse effects along with reduced cost and hospital stay. Hence the results of this research should be effectively utilized. About 92 percent of the patients were given intravenous therapy whereas

Threat of the over use of technology ( computer ) in teaching student Research Paper

Threat of the over use of technology ( computer ) in teaching student in primary schools - Research Paper Example hnology offers a variety of benefits to enhance the quality of education and make the process of learning more convenient and interesting both for the teacher and the students, overuse of technology in teaching students in primary schools poses several kinds of threats as well. â€Å"Family, school, and workplace environments are now on the verge of what can be termed the â€Å"Triple Disconnect† – from self, others and nature† (zonein.ca, 2014). The Canadian Society of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Pediatrics state that infants between 0 and 2 years of age should not be exposed to any kind of technology at all, children from 3 to 5 years of age should not be exposed to technology for more than just one hour per day, whereas the exposure of children in the age-range of 6 to 18 years to technology should be limited to 2 hours per day (Rowan, 2014). Threats posed by the overuse of technology in primary schools include but are not limited to the social chal lenge of isolation, reduced motivation for the studies on the part of the students, and increased tendency to have negative effects of using technology on their health. Overuse of technology in the classroom can be a cause of isolation of the students. â€Å"[C]ritics have written and spoken extensively of their beliefs that schools should not use technology for a variety of reasons ranging from creating social isolation to preventing students from learning critical basic skills† (ncrel.org, 2005). Students of primary schools are essentially children. Children as students need close supervision and monitoring in order to have their attention directed solely towards the studies. With the growing literacy rate, the population of students in the primary schools has increased over the years. This has raised challenges for the school administration in general and for the teachers in particular. Teachers today have more students to supervise than they used to have in the past. However, the increased strength of